Tim and Paul Samaras, Carl Young: Meteorological Community Loses Three Great Men

Having never visited the Plains, I've only experienced the immense power of tornadic supercell thunderstorms virtually, through my computer and television. I remember one particular documentary (National Geographic I believe) that I must have watched at least 10 or 20 times when I was younger about severe thunderstorms and storm chasing. Of course Twister was a must see and still is my favorite weather movie. I always wanted to chase storms one day.
------
Mike Bettes and his team were lucky.

They came away with bruises and needed stitches after being hurled over 200 yards by the EF-3 El Reno, OK twister on Friday, May 31, 2013. Their mangled chase vehicle was severely contorted. After this news, many in the meteorological community hoped that this near death experience of a high-profile chase team would change storm chasing in the future before someone indeed did perish.

Sadly, it was confirmed this morning that three chasers, Tim and Paul Samaras and Carl Young, died in that same tornado on Friday.

These three highly experienced storm chasers weren't your recreational folk seeking a thrill. They were trained scientists, sometimes featured on the Discovery Channel and National Geographic, researching the atmospheric environment in and around tornadoes to gain a better understanding of why some storms produce tornadoes and others don't. This WAS Twister.

The outpouring of remembrance for the Tim, Paul, and Carl has been stunning and shows how tight-knit the weather community is and how many people were inspired by their work. Although I never met any of the three, I've heard numerous stories from colleagues over the past day. Those that knew Tim say he was doing amazing work and that the field as lost a great man.

This tragic event highlights the danger of storm chasing, especially for those not experienced and trained in meteorology. Unpredictable storms, combined with congested roads can lead to a "no way out" scenario.

There is certainly a bigger discussion to be had here regarding storm chasing and those that do it for research vs. those that do it to seek thrills. That however, will be saved for another day.
------
While chasing is still something I'd love to do some day, events like this past Friday remind me, and the rest of the world, of the risks involved. Even with the best intentions, latest technology, and some of the smartest minds in the business, chasing Mother Nature's monsters can go horribly wrong.

RIP Tim, Paul, and Carl

Quite the show of remembrance. Storm chasers use their GPS locaters to position themselves in the initials of the three chasers who died Friday.

Nat Geo's last interview with Tim
Tim Samaras Bio

Les Miserables: An Emotional Epic Fit for Film

It's not often a movie can make you leave the theater both completely drained emotionally, yet hopeful and inspired about the piece of art you just saw. Les Miserables is one of those movies.

An avid Les Mis fan for the past 8 years since I saw the revival on Broadway, I was eager to see the Tom Hooper's film and finally got around to it last night (after a delicious Red Lobster dinner). Going into the movie, I'd read some less than favorable reviews that had criticisms such as "the middle is drags" and "many of [Schonberg's] songs just seem to peter out." My parents had also said that Russel Crowe was poorly cast as Javert. So I was ready to be less than 100% impressed....At the End of the Day (pun intended), I was bowled over by the film and emotionally moved in a similar, if not more intense way than when I saw the stage version (2 times).

Are there things the movie could have done better? Sure. Are there moments where I wished I was watching Alfie Boe as Valjean instead of Jackman? Sure, but Jackman does an admirable job bearing the burden of the character--his opening soliloquy should win him an Oscar by itself...if it wasn't for that performance by Lewis in Lincoln.

One of the great things about the film version of Les Mis is the ability to use cinematography to make it such a sweeping epic. The film begins with a shot under the water and slowly pans up to above the water-line to a storm ravaged shipyard where Valjean is enslaved. From there forth, each time the time advances by a number of years (the film takes place in 3 main segments), Hooper decides to use a "pan-up" which is an awesome technique. He pans up as Valjean ends his soliloquy on the edge of a cliff. A pan up is used over top of a church after Javert's "Stars". And lastly, the camera pans up and over the monastery as Valjean dies. What this symbolizes is evident. Each pan up is part of Valjean's ascension to being a better man whether it be finding god, realizing love, or lastly, dying and ascending to heaven (the other side of the monastery) where the rest of the dead from the movie reside and they sing the closing number. As a side note, the faith based message of the film is spot on and there are subtle hints in the camera work throughout such as the pan-up (again) above Valjean as he finishes "Bring Him Home."

In addition to the phenomenal camera work just mentioned, the use of zoomed in shots on characters while they sing exceptionally emotional songs is a different and useful method. Fantine first gets this treatment and Hathaway soars...a lock for an Oscar. Somewhat overlooked is Eddie Redmayne's "Empty Chairs at Empty Tables." He plays a fantastic Marius and this song is the 2nd best performance in the film behind Hathaway.

Aside from the cinematography (and great use of lighting...which I won't go into for sake of length), the orchestration is exceptional. Having only seen this on Broadway with a relatively small pit orchestra, hearing Shonberg's score fully orchestrated and played by a full orchestra was a treat. While it stays true to the original, small tweaks here and there only add to the soundscape. "Stars", despite Crowe's performance, is a fresh take on the song while the arrangements of the opening 10 minutes of music are extraordinary.

I would be remiss if I didn't talk about Crowe's troubling performance as Javert. Was he terrible? No. But when you compare anyone to the original (Philip Quast), they have no chance. Thankfully Crowe is in tune but just doesn't have the right voice for the part. Javert should have a gravely, deep voice and Crowe just doesn't have the right timbre for it. On the flip side, his acting during "Stars" and his suicide is superb and you really feel the agony with which his character has to deal.

Lastly, Jackman, while not over-the-top impressive as Valjean is very good. I thought his rendition of Bring Him Home was pedestrian yet his soliloquy and "Who Am I?" superb. Another role that is not mentioned much is Eponine. Samantha Banks nails both On My Own and A Little Fall of Rain. The Thenardier's? Fantastic...perfect!

All-in-all, Les Mis gets a 9/10 from me and was close to a 10/10. I'm still confused with the casting of Crowe as Javert but he could have been much worse. The risk Hooper took with live singing and zoomed-in camera work could have completely backfired but instead really makes the movie feel real. I challenge viewers not to get emotional (or cry)...it's not easy as there are MANY opportunities to do so!

Les Miserables was epic...only made more epic by Colm Wilkinson playing the bishop (awesome symbolism).

We Were Penn State? Hardly

The upcoming Sports Illustrated cover says it all: "We Were Penn State." That's right, heinous crimes, a cover-up, $60 million in fines, stripping of scholarships, and a multiple year post-season ban strips Penn State of its identity. The university will never recover and is no longer Penn State.

What a load of crap.

While I'm sure this copy of SI will fly off the racks due to the dramatic cover, it twists the knife into a community that already has taken a lambasting from the media and much of the public. Maybe SI should donate half of it's proceeds from this issue to child abuse protection. But I guess that would be a common-sense and productive solution which people in power seem to be incapable of making.

From the alleged (has not been proven in a court of law and the Freeh report has a lower burden of proof) cover-up at Penn State to the nuclear bomb that Mark Emmert and the NCAA dropped on the Nittany Lions today, the leaders in the sporting world cannot seem to do what is right.

Clearly there is a big difference between the actions of Sandusky, Curley, Schultz, Spanier, and Paterno to that of Mark Emmert but both situations could have been handled differently. The Penn State gang should have made sure Sandusky was stopped while Emmert should have directed his urge to satisfy the lynch mob by using these tragic events to start a discussion of priorities in collegiate athletics. 

Instead, he wielded his power to cripple the Penn State program and use it as an example. He made it sound as if Penn State is the only school to put it's football (or in some cases basketball) program ahead of everything else. Has he ever traveled to SEC country? Will these sanctions on Penn State prompt other universities to take a hard, close look at their priorities? I doubt it.

Going back to the Sports Illustrated cover, they are wrong. So dead wrong.

Why?

Because you can't take away the memories thousands of us have of this great university. If I were a senior in high school today I would still make the same decision I did several years ago and attend Penn State. 

I didn't make that decision because of Joe Paterno.

I did it because of the magical feeling I got when I stepped onto campus for the first time.

I did it because of the fantastic people I met in the meteorology department during my first visit.

I did it for the opportunity to audition for the best collegiate marching band in the nation.

I was fortunate enough to make the the Blue Band and some of my best memories of Penn State revolve around the people I met in that organization. While the bowl games were fun, they pale in comparison to my most vivid memories as a member of the Blue Band.

Whether it be walking across campus at dawn on a crisp, Saturday morning in late October with frost covering the ground and hearing the crack of snare drums rifle across the IM fields, or marching into Beaver Stadium during pregame, or taking a moment out of rehearsal to view a spectacular sunset, all of these memories will stay with me forever.

I got to travel to Indianapolis and Tucson, proudly representing Penn State as a member of the basketball pep band. 

My education at Penn State prepared me for the job I now enjoy at AccuWeather. 

During my senior year, I was given the opportunity to attend the annual American Meteorological Society conference in Seattle where I networked with professionals in my field and met many interesting people and learned about a variety of specific topics in the atmospheric sciences.

I share these memories with the huge number of friends I met at Penn State. Although it is such a big place, you never know where you might run into someone. That was never clearer than last night when I was downtown grabbing a drink when a fellow sax player walked past. He was just up visiting for the day, yet we happened to run into each other and spent time catching-up. It's these impromptu experiences that make Happy Valley such a special place.

From parties and bars downtown to going ice skating to meeting truly awesome people, the memories I made will never go away.

There is no doubt the sanctions levied on Penn State will hurt the football program and negatively impact parts of our community, but we must overcome. We are being tested and we must prevail.

Before each football game, Dr. Bundy (director of the Blue Band and someone I had the privilege of working with for 4 years) would call us in for a huddle. Our 300+ member band would unite, mentally preparing for the upcoming day. "Carpe the heck out of the diem," he would say. These words are always words to live by but have greater meaning now. We must persevere, we must stay strong. We cannot let the public and media define us.

It's not the scholarships and bowl games.

It's the experiences.

It's the people you meet and will never forget.

A Dark Day at Penn State: The Scathing Freeh Report

Although not the darkest day in the history of Penn State (that is saved for the day the allegations were released), today couldn't get much worse for us Nittany Lions. The release of the scathing Freeh Report not only confirmed much of what we knew, but made it vividly clear that our leaders failed us. Our community failed us. And Joe Paterno, a man who many think could do nothing wrong, failed us.

While I am sure there are many people out there still blinded by the good Joe Paterno did for the university and will no doubt condemn this report as a biased attack on a dead man, there is no doubt, upon reading the report, that Paterno played a role in this cover-up. If you are a Penn Stater and are unwilling to admit that, then you really should re-examine the evidence, and your try to be unbiased.

Having said that, all of the great things Joe Paterno should not be forgotten. He contributed much to the university that will never be forgotten. However, as he himself said, "I wish I had done more." Joe Paterno made a fatal mistake. Spanier, Curley, Schultz, the police, and many others made major mistakes.

Obviously many people around the nation will want the death penalty for the football team or for the university itself. Critics will say that Penn State is tarnished beyond repair. Some may also even say that a Penn State degree is damaged.

That is an overreaction.

However, as the Freeh report states, the culture of Penn State must be examined. This was allowed to happen because certain people wielded so much power and the Board of Trustees did not do their proper job of oversight. While this is most definitely an issue at Penn State and much has been done in the past months to combat this culture, there needs to be a bigger discussion about collegiate football.

It is impossible to believe that something this catastrophic could ONLY happen at Penn State. Football is as important, if not more so, at schools just as Notre Dame, USC, Florida, Ohio State, etc. To believe that certain people in these organizations would not go to similar lengths to prevent bad publicity is foolish. Power promotes corruption but we put people in positions of power who we believe will do the right thing. That was not the case at Penn State. Hopefully those at other universities, corporations, and governments will take this tragic case to heart and ensure it doesn't happen again.

One last point which in no way is in no way an attempt to exonerate Paterno but merely explain some of his actions is a generational issue. From speaking with people Paterno's age, it seems that people of that generation do not understand what child rape is. Many years ago it almost seems that things like this was never discussed and that it was taboo. Again, not saying what Paterno did was right, but that he may not have fully comprehended a man raping a man.

In the end, this is a dark time for Penn State and alumni will no doubt take heavy criticism. But we must remember that tens of thousands of Penn Staters were innocent in all of this and that we represent all that is excellent at our university. The most important thing (other than the victims) in this horrific tragedy is to learn from the terrible mistakes of those who were corrupted by power. Let us all treat every decision in our lives with importance. And let us never take the easy way out in order to "save face." WE must do the right thing, even if it is the hardest. WE Are Penn State.

Nine in a Row? Whoa!

Hitting .208 with runners in scoring position; needing home runs to win games. This doesn't necessarily sound like the recipe for a long winning streak in baseball but that is indeed what the New York Yankees did over the past 9 games--win them all.

Stats can be misleading and incomplete. Despite not taking advantage of scoring opportunities, the Yanks still rampaged through the NL East due to outstanding starting pitching and opportune power hitting.

With an ERA of 1.82 during the winning streak and 15 home runs, the 16-77 stat with RISP is much more meaningless.

In years past, a sweep of 3 teams in the NL East might have been thought of as something a bit less impressive. This year however, the NL East is one of the strongest divisions in baseball and the Yanks beat the Mets,  Braves, and Nationals, all teams with winning records. According to Elias Sports Bureau, it is the first time in franchise history that Yanks had a winning streak of this length against teams with winning records.

The Yanks are definitely on fire and now head back to New York looking to make it a clear 12 and 0 against the NL East when they face the Braves tonight. And who better to take the mound than ace CC Sabathia.

The scary thing about how the Yanks are playing is that if they actually hit with runners in scoring position they would be many times better and absolutely crushing opponents. New York is playing extremely well and you can't argue with 9 in a row but if they can fire on all cylinders, they could run away with the division.

Yankees May Review: Can I Get A Hit?

Once again, about a half month late on this and I have been absent from posting since last month but I hope I can change that over the summer. A look at the Yankees in May...

Record: 14-14

Offensive Stats:
Batting Average: .261 (6th in AL)
Slugging Percentage: .445 (3rd in AL)
Home Runs: 39 (3rd in AL)
RBI: 108 (11th in AL)
Runs: 112 (11th in AL)
Hits: 246 (9th in AL)
My Grade Average: 2.50 (~B-) 

Thoughts: It was a rough month for the offense and my B- average might be a bit generous. Although they were 14-14 they still have yet to win a game where they haven't hit a home run. As has been well documented across the media, hitting with RISP has been atrocious and even worse has been hitting with the bases loaded (still a sub-.200 average). The good news is that the home runs keep coming. Brett Gardner is still out and looks to be for a long time so the Yanks have to find other ways to produce runs. Cano has started to hit and A-Rod and Tex showed some signs of life although they haven't been as good as they should be. Overall a mediocre month for the bats.

Pitching Stats:
ERA: 3.97 (6th in AL)
Hits Allowed: 252 (6th most in AL)
Earned Runs Allowed: 108 (10th most in AL)
Home Runs: 38 (2nd most in AL)
Walks: 79 (12th most in AL)
Strikeouts: 210 (7th in AL)
My Starting Pitching Grade Average: 3.02 (~B)
My Bullpen Grade Average: 3.20 (~B+)

Thoughts: The pitching was on the upswing for the Yanks in May, much improved from their quite dismal April start. The return of Andy Pettitte added a nice spark to the rotation and he has been a solid number 2 starter. The stat categories listed above showed much improvement from April and the ERA has dropped significantly to a much more acceptable level (it has been even better in June so far).

Pitcher Breakdown (# of starts); Starter Grade/Offensive Support Grade/Bullpen Support Grade

Sabathia (5): 3.60/3.07/3.33 (Yankees were 3-2 in his starts) 
Kuroda (5): 2.73/1.60/3.07 (Yankees were 2-3 in his starts)
Hughes (6):  2.95/2.83/2.89 (Yankees were 3-3 in his starts)
Nova (6):  2.89/2.72/3.78 (Yankees were 4-2 in his starts)
Pettitte (4): 3.42/2.50/3.17 (Yankees were 2-2 in his starts)
Phelps (2): 2.17/1.67/2.50 (Yankees were 0-2 in his starts)
Thoughts: A fairly blah month for starting pitching as a whole. Phelps provided a quality bridge to Pettitte despite the 2 losses in his starts. The Yanks won 4 of 6 starts by Nova who continues to get run support and good bullpen relief (highest for the team). Sabathia was fairly consistent although had a sub-par outing or two. Kuroda was hit or miss but seemed to find himself late in the month. The enigma that is Phil Hughes continued but fortunately June seems like a much better month for the right-hander.

Yankees April Review: The Bullpen Shines

**This is the first installment of the Yankees monthly review.  I'll summarize the previous month and give my grade averages for each category and starting pitcher for the month as well as the cumulative averages.  Grades are numerically calculated using a GPA type system where an A+ is a 4.33, A is a 4.0, A- is a 3.67, B+ is a 3.33 and so on.  The numbers are then averaged for each category.** 


So this about a half a month overdue but better late than never. Let's take a look at the month of the April for New York.


Record: 13-9  (16-9 in 2011)


Offensive Stats:
Batting Average: .273 (3rd in AL)
Slugging Percentage: .472 (3rd in AL)
Home Runs: 37 (1st in AL)
RBI: 116 (3rd in AL)
Runs: 120 (3rd in AL)
Hits: 208 (3rd in AL)
My Grade Average: 3.09 (~B)


Thoughts: A successful start to the season with an unusual red-hot start from Nick Swisher. Someone is looking for a ton of money in the off season. The middle of the order had a slow start and you begin to wonder if A-Rod is in decline given his age. Teixiera on the other hand always seems to start slow and has been battling a cold. Thankfully, Derek Jeter has just turned 25 years old and is amazing everybody with his ridiculous start. Hitting .440+ versus left handers and .330ish since his 3,000th hit last summer. Biggest issue with the offense is the lack of manufacturing runs without the long ball. It always seems to be a problem and doesn't get any easier with Brett Gardner out.


Pitching Stats:
ERA: 4.33 (11th in AL)
Hits Allowed: 204 (4th most in AL)
Earned Runs Allowed: 95 (3rd most in AL)
Home Runs: 27 (4th most in AL)
Walks: 64 (9th most in AL)
Strikeouts: 192 (1st in AL)
My Starting Pitching Grade Average: 2.61 (~B-)
My Bullpen Grade Average: 3.57 (almost an A-)


Thoughts: You can never have too much starting pitching. After the ineffectiveness of Garcia we saw Pettitte and Phelps in May who both pitched much more effectively. However the starting rotation continues to struggle. Hughes was pretty terrible in April (although he has turned it around in May). Nova had a good record but poor ERA--inconsistent. CC got on track after a few poor outings to start. Kuroda still seems to struggle with the American League--will be interesting to see how he fares. Bullpen continues to be a strength though. But we all know how that would fall apart after April with Mo's ACL and Roberston's ribs. It will be very interesting to see May's bullpen effectiveness.


Pitcher Breakdown (# of starts); Starter Grade/Offensive Support Grade/Bullpen Support Grade

Sabathia (5): 3.47/3.93/3.73 (Yankees were 4-1 in his starts)
Kuroda (5): 3.07/2.47/3.86 (Yankees were 2-3 in his starts)
Hughes (4): 1.59/2.17/3.25 (Yankees were 1-3 in his starts)
Nova (4): 3.50/3.75/3.83 (Yankees were 4-0 in his starts)
Garcia (4): 1.08/3.09/3.08 (Yankees were 2-2 in his starts)


Thoughts: Clearly Nova and Sabathia stood out as the 2 good starters. Kuroda had a decent start but struggled at times. Garcia and Hughes were terrible quite frankly. Especially Garcia who received 2 consecutive grades of "F". That's pretty impressively terrible. The good news is that the Yanks were able to win 3 of the 8 starts by Hughes/Garcia. All starters benefited from good bullpen support while CC got a ton of offense in his starts.